I would like to discuss a subset of poems in which Paula Bohince makes use of different perspectives in order to more deeply illustrate her father's murder. The four poems are The Apostles, The Gospel According to Lucas, The Gospel According to Paul, and The Gospel According to John.
In The Apostles, the narrator gives us a more general, less-biased perspective on the incident. The first stanza is an attention-grabber, starting with: “Begin with a paper bag / flush with crumpled hundreds.” By introducing money, it sets up the idea of greed and love of money (Bible reference), which will eventually lead to death of the narrator's father. The second stanza tells us of the “reborn” man (Bible reference) who relies on this money to survive, to pay his laborers. Next, in the third stanza, the narrator asks the audience to consider the point of view of the laborers, describing them with the line: “cheated, ruined, furious.” The narrator spends the rest of poem talking hypothetically about the murder: “if they surprised him ... if they wanted to see the money ... if they finished him.” She doesn't want to make any accusations; she feels pity for both sides. But we are able to see what happened.
In the three Gospel poems, we are able to watch the three men reflect on their sin. Between the three men, there are obvious feelings of regret and justification. Lucas, I think, feels both; in the third stanza of his poem, he uses the metaphor of the fish who fall for the the tricks of the workers, ending up pathetic and dead. The workers feel as if they are being tricked by the boss and have the same pathetic, lifeless feeling. Lucas feels cheated, and thus justified in doing the deed. However, he shows his regrets when he discusses his “intent to be a good man / filled with mercy.” Paul doesn't seem very regretful, but uses a different animal metaphor to justify his actions: “The ravenous mouthes of the beetles ... Theirs is an innocent hunger.” The workers are the beetles; their greed is justified. Within the three remaining lines, Paul uses the word “innocent” two more times, because he feels that he is. John is the most regretful, and rightfully so, seeing as he pulled the trigger. I didn't recognize this, though, until the last line. He sets it up by talking about feeling like God, seeing his creations, the results of his power. But the line: “belonging to His kingdom of violence.” made me think that it's a reference to God's sorrow, as he sees his creations committing horrible sins.
Just as Peter Oresick showed us in Warhol-o-rama, each new perspective is a different angle from which we can look at a topic; the more angles we have, the better we understand exactly what the author is putting forth.